How is it like Damien Hirst's show at the Wallace Collection?!
1)They are not a museum.
2)They are not bringing contemporary art into a museum context.
2)Unlike the Wallace they are not giving a solo exhibition to a banal commercial art brands' worst out put yet in a setting that bares no connection with the work at all.
3)The gallery mail out I just read made an interesting comparison between each Hogarth it mentions and a Ross Jones drawing. It also places him in the context of Hogarth and that tradition, not as an equal. These works are clearly included to add context not value.
4)Do you know the £value of a Hogarth etching?! They are not paintings by Goya! This is not value by association.
5)To the best of my knowledge that train wreck Hirst painting show did little to raise his value, in fact it probably lowered it. Derivative, boring paintings are not exactly "The impossibility of death in the mind of someone living" now are they.
If you have to make such a pointless comparison with a museum show you might perhaps pick the current British Museum exhibition where Grayson Perry responds to objects in the collection - a properly considered exhibition at least.
Sorry, there was an error.