09 February, 2010
08 February, 2010
Prophetik - Interview with Designer Jeff Garner
08 February, 2010
Jonathan Ward - Little Wonder at Kaleid Editions
04 February, 2010
Rubbish Magazine - Interview with Jenny Dyson
02 February, 2010
01 February, 2010
2009 looks set to be an exciting year for science: 12th February sees the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin and we've already had the Richard Dawkins-endorsed Atheist Bus Campaign, with its catchy slogan 'There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life'.
Now, as much as I think that these adverts are an interesting addition to the debate, I also loathe Richard Dawkins. And I'm certainly not one to let reason stand in the way of personal prejudice. What annoys me so much – aside from his ill-informed intervention into the Sokal Affair – is that he seems even more dogmatic and less open to alternate ideas than your average rabid evangelical loon.
For Dawkins, science is a system that provides all the answers. There is no room for doubt. Well I don't think it is, and in search of scientists to agree with me, I decide to attend the promisingly entitled lecture 'What Science Can't Tell Us' at the ICA.
The evening is chaired by Vivienne Parry, that one who used to be on Tomorrow's World, and features Michael Brooks, New Scientist consultant and author of 13 Things That Don't Make Sense, and maverick scientist (no it's not an oxymoron) Rupert Sheldrake.
The evening takes in all manner of topics that scientists have been unable to prove or disprove one way or the other. There's the ongoing enigma of homeopathy, the fact that we still haven't been able to distinguish rigorously between what's dead and what's alive, the gaps in our knowledge of developmental biology (DNA does not explain all, Dawko) and the issue of dark matter and dark energy, which have been 'known' about since 1935, but we're still yet to see any. I personally think that they are both just part of an ingenious invention to cover up the fact that science has got its sums wrong. But what do I know...
These are all more or less interesting, but the evening really takes off when we get on to the subject of the scientific institution itself. Sheldrake has been largely shunned by the scientific community for his research into seemingly unscientific areas – whether pets are indeed telepathic, for example. He describes himself as 'something of a feral scientist' and laments that 'institutional science is stultified, dogmatic and cramped by the grants system'. Sheldrake cites the work carried out by Richard Wiseman by way of example: Wiseman carried out the same experiments as Sheldrake did for his book Dogs That Know When Their Owners are Coming Home, and - according to Sheldrake at least - got the same results. But because they contradicted his existing beliefs he refused to acknowledge them.*
This, according to Sheldrake, is 'pathological science' and there is a lot of it about. It is, he says for example, 'hard to encounter somebody as dogmatic as Richard Dawkins'. If Darwin is a kind of Marx figure, then Dawkins is comparable in some ways to Stalin: he is 'an extreme fanatical dogmatist'. Just as Marx was clearly not a Stalinist so 'the real Darwin was not a neo-Darwinist'.
What this lecture reveals is that, as much as Dawkins and the institution would like to suggest otherwise, the scientific community is just like any other: it has its own rifts, agendas, schisms and personalities. Science is not homogenous, nor should it be. 'Science does not equal institutional science', Sheldrake says. It is the institutionalisation and homogenisation of science (as epitomised by Dawkins) that attempts to impose an ideological hegemony.
At this point, a member of the audience, losing patience with the squabbling about the scientific institution, asks 'Please can you just explain What Science Can't Tell Us?' to which Brooks replies:
'The truth. Science can only answer the questions that we ask of nature. Scientists need to be a bit more skeptical about their own findings, they need to be a bit more circumspect about what they actually do. Science is not the ultimate arbiter of truth.'
Thank you Michael. That is what I came to hear.
* Wiseman would not agree with Sheldrake on this. Click here to read more.
* And Sheldrake replies to Wiseman here.
Looking for Halloween events? Get our comprehensive guide to London Halloween events. If you're stuck for costumes then get creative with our Homemade Halloween Costumes article. Find somewhere to wear your outfit to with our guide to the Best Halloween Parties. Click here for London events.
Keen for more? See more about:
Jonny Sweet: Interview
Jonny Sweet may have won the 'Best Newcomer' title at the Edinburgh Fringe last August but like ma...
Erdem Moralioglu - Interview
I think the first proper fashion show I ever went to was the second Fashion Fringe initiative back ...
Preview: Lost Soul Music at Pleasance Theatre
White Rose Theatre hail from York and had a runaway success with TONY! The Blair Musical at the Edinburgh...
LFW Launches a Digital Schedule
London Fashion week seems incapable of doing wrong. The vanguard of cutting edge fashion turns technologic...
Lacuna Coil at Shepherd's Bush Empire
Set within the suitably extravagant Shepherd's Bush Empire, tonight's gothic revelries come thick and...